| Left behind at the end of the world? | |||||||||
|
Left Behind is a series of novels that describe the end of the world or end of the age that is expected by some Christians. They read the New Testament book of Revelation as literally as a newspaper or a scientific report, and they accept some assumptions, such as “the rapture.” The Greek word translated “Revelation” is “Apocalypse,” which is the best title for this strange book in the New Testament. I urge that we always call that biblical book the Apocalypse of John because it doesn't reveal much — except confusion. ApocalypticApocalypse is a type of literature in the Old and New Testaments, one kind of literature alongside of history, parables, poetry, stories, songs, prophesy, and other forms of literature that grace the Bible. There are few examples of apocalypse, while far more examples of history, parables, poetry, songs, prophesy. Apocalyptic writings believe passionately that the world has become so evil, that the only way for God to triumph is for God to break into history and directly and personally set things right. The roots of this symbolic writing followed the trauma of the conquest of Judea, destruction of the Temple, and exiling of most people. One of those exiles was Ezekiel, whose book has strange, symbolic images. Apocalyptic literature appeared fully in the book of Daniel, which was written after the most desolating event — the desolating sacrilege — in the centuries before the coming of Christ. "The
Desolating Sacrilege" Two different
reactions The other reaction was to take direct action. The Maccabean family started a guerilla war against the armies of Antiochus Epiphanes and won! The history of that war is in the books of Maccabees in the Apocrypha — an amazing history to read. It is a classic guerilla war in which the Maccabean fighters knew the geography very well and used that knowledge to beat the formal armies of Antiochus. In the New Testament apocalyptic writing is found in two places. It is most of the book of the Apocalypse of John, and it is the "synoptic apocalypse" in Mark 13 that was copied into Matthew 24 and Luke 21. The Apocalypse of John after clear letters to seven Churches is then apocalyptic. In the first century the Roman authorities could not understand that it attacks worship of the Emperor, but we have lost the keys to the code. In contrast to the apocalyptic waiting for God, the letters of the New Testament reveal people living the best of life in the worst of time with little thought about the apocalyptic. These two radically different ways to confront awful reality continue for over two thousand years! Do we wait for God to intervene or do we take matters into our own hands and with God’s help and guidance do the best we can? You may dismiss the Apocalypse with Luther's, it is "neither apostolic nor prophetic," or Jefferson's "as merely the ravings of a maniac." |
||||||||
The series of novels in the Left Behind series represent the apocalyptic view. Some preachers and some denominations concentrate on an apocalyptic end of the world. They believe it is coming very soon. Much of this expectation focuses on the Middle East around Jerusalem, claiming that the end of this age will begin there with Jesus' physical return. Many of them believe that the temple mount will be involved and there will be a battle of Armageddon. Christ will lead his followers to eternal joy who will enjoy seeing all others horribly doomed. This stimulates among many people passionate expectation and financial contributions. This apocalyptic view was popular in the United States during the 19th century a few times when charismatic preachers led followers to expect an end of the age and of the world often on specific dates. Always, as in the Old Testament book of Daniel, those dates came and nothing happened. As in Daniel, new dates were set, but again it did not happen. Click here for an excellent summary of that history. But this "pre-millennial" idea that the world was not redeemable was not popular with the optimism of frontier people. It became more popular after the frontier was settled and cities grew. Remember the alternative, like the Maccabean revolt. When conditions became intolerable, leaders, who were often charismatic, led reforms. The Protestant Reformers Luther, Calvin, Wesley, Fox, and others revolted against church conditions and renewed Christian faith and life. The labor union movement was one of several reactions to abysmal conditions in the work place that led to greatly improved working conditions and higher wages. Twelve-hour work days were reduced to eight, and railroad crews got eight-hour breaks between shifts of driving locomotives. Much of the Church cooperated with the trade union movement in the 1930's and 40's to confront work and urban problems. The civil rights movement eliminated legal discrimination and legally secured the vote. Feminism, which is condemned by many fundamentalists, secured many rights for women not available earlier, and questioned patriarchal assumptions. In these and many other situations people have responded not by waiting for an apocalypse, but rather by working together to change conditions. Some of these movements have involved bloodshed and violent reactions, while others have been nonviolent (the Birmingham bus boycott). In summary, apocalyptic believes only God can fix the problems of the world, while most of the Bible, including the prophets, teach that with God's guidance and grace we must work with others to fix the problems of the world. Jesus in the New Testament like many of the prophets of the Old Testament called people to act in this world and in this life for justice and peace guided by God, rather than wait for an apocalypse. Jesus says something intriguing in Luke 11:20: "If it is by the finger of God that I cast out the demons, then the kingdom of God has come to you." He seems to suggest that when he heals, when he teaches and people hear and act, the kingdom has come! The new age has dawned! This view is in the gospels and in Paul's letters. The Old Testament prophets were preachers against evil rather than foretellers of the future. Here are a few representative passages: Amos 5.21-24:
Hosea 6.3-6:
Hosea 11.1-4:
Micah 6.6-8:
Isaiah 61.1–4:
These words are like most of what the prophets said, they are about living in this world and in the present time — "they shall repair the ruined cities." They do not foretell the future. Jesus read the opening lines of Isaiah's poetic vision to start his ministry as reported in the gospel of Luke 4.14–22. Copyright © 2004 John F. Yeaman
|
|||||||||